State v. Downing

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Downing

2010 Ohio 716, 923 N.E.2d 612, 124 Ohio St. 3d 475

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 4, 2010

Docket2008-2009

StatusPublished

This text of 2010 Ohio 716 (State v. Downing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Downing, 2010 Ohio 716, 923 N.E.2d 612, 124 Ohio St. 3d 475 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Singleton. *476 Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Seth L. Gilbert and Sheryl L. Prichard, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant. Shaw & Miller, Mark J. Miller, and Douglas W. Shaw, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Singleton. *476 Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Seth L. Gilbert and Sheryl L. Prichard, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant. Shaw & Miller, Mark J. Miller, and Douglas W. Shaw, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2010 Ohio 716, 923 N.E.2d 612, 124 Ohio St. 3d 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-downing-ohio-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack