State v. Downing
This text of 458 A.2d 73 (State v. Downing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Matthew Downing appeals from his conviction of aggravated assault, 17-A M.R. S.A. § 208 (1983) following a jury trial in the Superior Court, Aroostook County. He complains of the trial court’s failure to give a requested jury instruction on serious bodily injury and asserts that the evidence of serious bodily injury was insufficient. We affirm the judgment.
Because the requested instruction was incomplete and misleading, we see no merit in Downing’s first claim. State v. Bennett, 416 A.2d 720, 723 (Me.1980). The jury instructions were adequate for this case. We likewise conclude that Downing’s claim of insufficiency of the evidence lacks merit. The medical evidence was sufficient to permit the jury rationally to conclude that Downing recklessly inflicted serious bodily injury upon the victim. State v. Colomy, 407 A.2d 1115, 1119-20 (Me.1979).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
458 A.2d 73, 1983 Me. LEXIS 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-downing-me-1983.