State v. Downham

1 Houston 45
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedApril 5, 1858
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Houston 45 (State v. Downham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Downham, 1 Houston 45 (Del. Ct. App. 1858).

Opinion

At a Court of Oyer and Terminer, held at this term, Joseph Downham was tried on a bill of indictment found against him at a preceding term of the Court, for the murder of a negro man named Cæsar Lewis in the forest of Murderkill hundred, on the 27th day of October, in the year 1852. He had emigrated from the State and settled in the State of Indiana, not long after the alleged murder, the secret of which had remained unknown to all except two or three persons until very recently, and on the finding of the bill of indictment against him, he had been arrested and surrendered in that and brought to this State on the requisition of the Governor. The indictment was under the statute then in force against the crime of murder, and which was before it had been modified and divided into two degrees in this State.

The first witness called was James Andrews, who testified that a man by the name of John Scott and himself were at work for the prisoner, mauling rails in the Owl's Nest Woods back of his house one morning between seven and nine o'clock, six years ago next October, and during the fall term of the Court here, when he passed right on by them with a gun in his hand into the woods in an easterly direction and disappeared from their view as he proceeded on into the woods. He came back between eleven and twelve o'clock with the gun still in his hand, and going towards his house, and as he passed by them he said to them, "a man has a right to shoot a squirrel in the woods wherever he can find it, aint he?" But he heard no report of a gun while he was gone, and saw him no more after that until about dark that day. He ate dinner at his house about noon, but did not see him then, as he had gone to Dover, so he was informed by some one at the house. It was after supper and he was sitting in his house, and they sat together there and talked some time. After awhile the prisoner said to him that he wanted him to take a walk with him, but he told him he could not, for his wife was sick and he must go home, but the prisoner *Page 47 said he must go, and he became alarmed and assented to his demand. After he sat a while longer he stepped into an adjoining room and brought out two guns and said to Pompey Tribbet and to him, "come, I want you to go," and handed him one of the guns to carry as he came out of the house, and he carried it all the way in his hand just as he ordered him, for he was scared from the start by his manner. The prisoner went ahead and they close to him and next Mary Lizzie, the house-keeper, who carried a lantern with her, but not lighted. They went back of the place where they had been at work that morning into the Owl's Nest Woods and stopped within fifteen or twenty yards of the road leading from Whitehall to Berrytown, and within twenty-five yards of Cæsar Lewis' home. They all stopped there. They then went in an easterly direction into the Owl's Nest Woods, the woman still carrying the lantern, not very far, when the prisoner said to him, "hand me that gun," and reached out his hand and took it from him, and then pointing his finger ahead said to him and Pompey to go there and see what that woman can find. They refused to go. He said go on; but they still refused to go, and after he found they would not go, he went ahead himself a short distance and then stopped and said "there is the body of Cæsar Lewis. I want you to take it up and bury it." Pompey said, "I can't until I see who it is before I do." The prisoner said "light the lantern Mary Lizzie, and let him see for himself." She lit it, and Pompey said yes, it is Cæsar Lewis, at the same time looking him right in the face. His body was lying on its back. The prisoner then said take it up and follow him, and they then took hold of it and found it so heavy they could not carry it. He saw his face, but he did not know Cæsar. He and Pompey then got two poles and laid his body across them and carried it, Pompey ahead and he behind, in a southerly direction about one hundred and fifty yards into the swamp, and until they gave out, when the prisoner said he guessed that would do, and that was far enough. The spade was then *Page 48 given to Pompey and he was told by the prisoner to dig a hole, which he did until he got tired, and then he took hold but soon got tired, when Pompey said don't dig any more, the hole is deep enough. The prisoner sat a few yards off with the gun between his knees, and said put him in the hole and cover him up. He had all his clothes on except his hat. Pompey then covered him up. It was then about ten o'clock. The prisoner then said there is one enemy laid low, and the first one who tells of this may expect to go the same road. He then turned round and started home and they all went back to his house.

On cross-examination he further stated that he did not tell Thomas Jester that he laid in the woods himself waiting for Cæsar Lewis, but told him that he was left in the woods to wait for him about three-quarters of a mile from his house, but that he did not watch for him. He told him he was left to watch for him and lay down by the fence and fell asleep — that was the day before. What he told Tester was that when the sheriff came down there he and the prisoner went along the road and told him to stay there and watch for Cæsar, and he thought he must obey the sheriff's orders, and after awhile he leaned the gun against a bush and lay down and fell asleep and slept till daylight awoke him. The prisoner said Cæsar had shot at him a night or two before and tried to kill him. He said he was afraid to risk his life so long as such a man run at large. He said he had been to Dover and Cæsar watched for him by a large cherry tree, and shot at him in his carriage as he passed, and the shot struck both his hat and the top of his carriage, and it was for that the sheriff was seeking to find him and arrest him. There were shot in both his hat and the carriage-top. They were shot in the night, for he saw them about sunrise the next morning, the morning the prisoner went by them when they were out mauling rails, in the Owl's Nest Woods.

Pompey Tribbet was then called and sworn as a witness, and when asked by the Attorney General if the prisoner *Page 49 had ever told him anything, and if so, what about the killing of Cæsar Lewis? The practice had long been settled to admit such testimony. The demands of public justice required the enabling statute to be passed, and it has always received a liberal interpretation in furtherance of that object; and when a crime has been committed in the absence of any witness, and a voluntary *Page 50 confession has afterwards been made of it, the necessity for the admission of it in the due administration of public justice, is quite as great as proof of the factum of the offence itself when it can be had. Besides, if no white person was present when the homicide was committed, we consider the words of the statute broad enough without any forced construction in view of the object of it, to admit the testimony under the terms of it.

The witness then proceeded and stated that four or five years ago last fall, while the Court was in session here, he rode with the prisoner in his carriage from his house to Dover, and that it was after one o'clock in the afternoon when they started, and sometime after they had got on the road leading by White Hall, the prisoner said to him that he had something to tell him — that he had shot the hawk certain. He then asked him what kind of a hawk? He said Cæsar Lewis.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Houston 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-downham-delsuperct-1858.