State v. Down
856 P.2d 645, 122 Or. App. 416, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1367
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of three counts of robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415, after he entered into a plea agreement. Defendant appeals, arguing that the court erred in calculating his criminal history. Under ORS 138.222(2)(d), we may not review his claim of error. See State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Down, 856 P.2d 645, 122 Or. App. 416, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1367 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).
856 P.2d 645 (State v. Down) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Johnston
851 P.2d 1156 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
State v. Kilborn
852 P.2d 935 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
State v. Adams
847 P.2d 397 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1993)