Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Down

State v. Down

856 P.2d 645, 122 Or. App. 416, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1367
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 18, 1993
Docket91C-20972; CA A73663
StatusPublished

This text of 856 P.2d 645 (State v. Down) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Down, 856 P.2d 645, 122 Or. App. 416, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1367 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of three counts of robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415, after he entered into a plea agreement. Defendant appeals, arguing that the court erred in calculating his criminal history. Under ORS 138.222(2)(d), we may not review his claim of error. See State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Johnston
851 P.2d 1156 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
State v. Kilborn
852 P.2d 935 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
State v. Adams
847 P.2d 397 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
856 P.2d 645, 122 Or. App. 416, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-down-orctapp-1993.