State v. Dover

193 S.E.2d 477, 17 N.C. App. 150, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1600
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided December 20, 1972·No. No. 7210SC801·Published

Opinion

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial judge to suppress the evidence on the grounds that it was obtained with the use of an invalid search warrant.

We hold that the search warrant and the affidavit attached thereto are in substantial compliance with statutory and constitutional requirements and the trial judge did not err in denying defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of a search of defendant’s premises under authority thereof. State v. Vestal, 278 N.C. 561, 180 S.E. 2d 755 (1971); State v. Flowers, 12 N.C. App. 487, 183 S.E. 2d 820 (1971); cert. den. 279 N.C. 728, 184 S.E. 2d 885 (1971); State v. Moye, 12 N.C. App. 178, 182 S.E. 2d 814 (1971).

[152] After a careful examination of the record, we are of the opinion that the defendant had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Morris concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dover, 193 S.E.2d 477, 17 N.C. App. 150, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1600 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

193 S.E.2d 477 (State v. Dover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Flowers
184 S.E.2d 885 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Vestal
180 S.E.2d 755 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Moye
182 S.E.2d 814 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Flowers
183 S.E.2d 820 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)