State v. . Dove

22 S.E.2d 231, 222 N.C. 162, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 55
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 14, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 22 S.E.2d 231 (State v. . Dove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Dove, 22 S.E.2d 231, 222 N.C. 162, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 55 (N.C. 1942).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tbe defendant was indicted for murder. However, at tbe solicitor’s election be was not put on trial for first degree murder but for murder in tbe second degree or manslaughter. This was equivalent to taking a nolle prosequi on tbe capital charge. S. v. Gregory, 203 N. C., 528, 166 S. E., 387. At tbe close of tbe State’s evidence defendant’s motion for judgment as of ndnsuit was denied. Tbe solicitor then moved to be permitted to offer additional testimony. This motion was allowed, and, it appearing that tbe evidence desired was not presently available, tbe court ordered a mistrial, and continued tbe case. Tbe defendant excepted to tbe ruling of tbe trial judge, and appealed to this Court.

Tbe ordering of a mistrial in a case less than capital is a matter in tbe discretion of tbe court. S. v. Johnson, 75 N. C., 123; S. v. Upton, 170 N. C., 769, 87 S. E., 328; S. v. Ellis, 200 N. C., 77, 156 S. E., 157; S. v. Guice, 201 N. C., 761, 161 S. E., 533; S. v. Watson, 209 N. C., 229, 183 S. E., 286: In capital cases only is tbe judge required to find tbe facts and place them on record so that upon a plea of former jeopardy tbe action of 'the court may be reviewed. S. v. Tyson, 138 N. C., 627, 50 S. E., 456; S. v. Beal, 199 N. C., 278 (295), 154 S. E., 604.

It is apparent that tbe appeal is premature and must be dismissed. S. v. Andrews, 166 N. C., 349, 81 S. E., 416; S. v. Ford, 168 N. C., 165, 83 S. E., 831.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hickey
346 S.E.2d 646 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)
State v. Lindsey
213 S.E.2d 434 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
State v. Allen
183 S.E.2d 659 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Ball
178 S.E.2d 377 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Bowers
161 S.E.2d 11 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
State v. Humbles
84 S.E.2d 264 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Brock v. North Carolina
344 U.S. 424 (Supreme Court, 1953)
State v. Brock
67 S.E.2d 282 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
State v. Bowman
55 S.E.2d 789 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.E.2d 231, 222 N.C. 162, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dove-nc-1942.