State v. Douglass

Supreme Court of Kansas

State v. Douglass

83 P. 621, 72 Kan. 673, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 396

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedNovember 11, 1905

DocketNo. 14,370

StatusPublished

This text of 83 P. 621 (State v. Douglass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Douglass, 83 P. 621, 72 Kan. 673, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 396 (kan 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

An information, otherwise sufficient, presented, signed and sworn to by the county attorney, is not vulnerable to a motion to quash because the clerk of the district court, who administered the oath, after naming the county, omitted to follow such name with the word “county.”

The denying of an application to delay a trial until a party might present affidavits showing what absent witnesses would testify, not excepted to, cannot be considered by this court. In the present case no exceptions were taken to the denying of the application.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

An information, otherwise sufficient, presented, signed and sworn to by the county attorney, is not vulnerable to a motion to quash because the clerk of the district court, who administered the oath, after naming the county, omitted to follow such name with the word “county.”

The denying of an application to delay a trial until a party might present affidavits showing what absent witnesses would testify, not excepted to, cannot be considered by this court. In the present case no exceptions were taken to the denying of the application.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 P. 621, 72 Kan. 673, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-douglass-kan-1905.