State v. Douglas

292 Mont. 103
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 2, 1998
DocketNO. CR 98-64
StatusPublished

This text of 292 Mont. 103 (State v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Douglas, 292 Mont. 103 (Mo. 1998).

Opinion

On September 21, 1998, the Defendant was sentenced to the following: Count I: ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison; Count II, Count XI, and Count XII: six (6) months, each count, to the Park County Jail, to run concurrently with the sentence imposed in Count I.

On November 6, 1998, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Kevin Brown. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division provides: “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (Section 45-18-904(3), MCA.) The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Done in open Court this 6th day of November, 1998. DATED this 2nd day of December, 1998.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Member, Hon. Jeffrey H. Langton, Member, Hon. Richard G. Phillips and Alt. Member, Robert A. Boyd.

The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Kevin Brown for representing Mr. Douglas in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
292 Mont. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-douglas-mont-1998.