State v. Dougher

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Dougher

49 Mo. 409

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided February 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bliss, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was indicted for selling intoxicating liquors without license, and moved to quash the indictment because it was.not an indictable oifense. The motion being overruled he appeals. The question was considered in The State v. Huffschmidt, 47 Mo. 73. The defendant has not consented to this mode of the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction, and the case is reversed.

Judge Wagner concurs. Judge Adams absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bliss, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was indicted for selling intoxicating liquors without license, and moved to quash the indictment because it was.not an indictable oifense. The motion being overruled he appeals. The question was considered in The State v. Huffschmidt, 47 Mo. 73. The defendant has not consented to this mode of the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction, and the case is reversed.

Judge Wagner concurs. Judge Adams absent.

State v. Dougher, 49 Mo. 409 (Mo. 1872).

Pincite

49 Mo. 409 (State v. Dougher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related