State v. Doscher
376 A.2d 359, 172 Conn. 592, 1977 Conn. LEXIS 933
Opinion
The petition for certification is denied, it not appearing that “there are special and important reasons” to grant certification. Practice Book § 742. We repeat what we said in State v. Chisholm, 155 Conn. 706, 707, 236 A.2d 465: “[A] denial of certification does not necessarily indicate our approval either of the result reached by the Appellate Division or of the opinion rendered by it.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Doscher, 376 A.2d 359, 172 Conn. 592, 1977 Conn. LEXIS 933 (Colo. 1977).
376 A.2d 359 (State v. Doscher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of New London v. Foss & Bourke, Inc.
886 A.2d 1217 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)
A. Aiudi & Sons, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission
806 A.2d 77 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2002)
Clarke v. Commissioner of Correction
732 A.2d 754 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)
Mandanici v. Zoning Board of Appeals
717 A.2d 287 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)
Republic Insurance v. Pat Dinardo Auto Sales, Inc.
678 A.2d 516 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Grieco v. Zoning Commission
627 A.2d 432 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)
Pagano v. Board of Education
492 A.2d 197 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1985)
Mary Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Department of Probation and Attorney General of the State of Connecticut
632 F.2d 938 (Second Circuit, 1980)
Williams v. O'Neill
500 F. Supp. 913 (D. Connecticut, 1980)