State v. Dorsey

654 So. 2d 1094, 1995 La. LEXIS 1495, 1995 WL 335455
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 22, 1995·No. No. 95-KD-1282·Published

Opinion

In re Dorsey, Gregory; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 317-520.

Denied. Defendant does not set forth any grounds on which a motion to quash may be sustained. Insofar as the defendant is prejudiced by the state’s amendment of the indictment, his remedy is to seek a continuance of the trial of this matter. C.Cr.P. 488, 489; State v. Neslo, 433 So.2d 73, 81 (La.1983).

WATSON and VICTORY, JJ., denied without reasons. KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dorsey, 654 So. 2d 1094, 1995 La. LEXIS 1495, 1995 WL 335455 (La. 1995).

654 So. 2d 1094 (State v. Dorsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Neslo
433 So. 2d 73 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1983)