State v. Dorr

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Dorr

19 A. 157, 82 Me. 157, 1889 Me. LEXIS 101

CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine

DecidedNovember 20, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 A. 157 (State v. Dorr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dorr, 19 A. 157, 82 Me. 157, 1889 Me. LEXIS 101 (Me. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Virgin, J.

By R. S., c. 17, § 1, “all places used * * for the illegal sale or keeping of intoxicating liquors * * are common nuisances.” By § 2, “whoever keeps or maintains such nuisance shall he fined,” etc.

The indictment alleges with proper time and venue that John Dorr, without any lawful authority “did keep and maintain a common nuisance, to wit: a certain building in said Frankfort then and there used during all said time by him, the said Dorr, for the illegal sale and illegal keeping for sale of intoxicating liquors to the common nuisance,” etc.

We have no . doubt of the sufficiency of the indictment. No allegation of sale is necessary. State v. Lang, 63 Maine, 215, 219.

Exceptions overruled.

Judgment for the State.

Peters, O. J., Daneorth, Libbey, Emeey and Haskell, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI