State v. Dorn

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Dorn

164 A.3d 412, 229 N.J. 622, 2017 WL 1194669, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 368

DecidedMarch 29, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 164 A.3d 412 (State v. Dorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dorn, 164 A.3d 412, 229 N.J. 622, 2017 WL 1194669, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 368 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-006189-12 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

[623]*623It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the following issues: 1) whether the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a map identifying areas within 500 feet of public parks and buildings; and 2) whether defendant’s right to a grand jury indictment was violated when the trial court permitted the prosecutor to amend the indictment to expose defendant to greater criminal liability; and it is further

ORDERED that the appellant may serve and file a supplemental brief on or before May 30, 2017, and respondent may serve and file a supplemental brief forty-five (45) days after the filing of appellant’s supplemental submission, or, if appellant declines to file such a submission, on or before July 14, 2017.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-006189-12 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

[623]*623It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the following issues: 1) whether the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a map identifying areas within 500 feet of public parks and buildings; and 2) whether defendant’s right to a grand jury indictment was violated when the trial court permitted the prosecutor to amend the indictment to expose defendant to greater criminal liability; and it is further

ORDERED that the appellant may serve and file a supplemental brief on or before May 30, 2017, and respondent may serve and file a supplemental brief forty-five (45) days after the filing of appellant’s supplemental submission, or, if appellant declines to file such a submission, on or before July 14, 2017.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 A.3d 412, 229 N.J. 622, 2017 WL 1194669, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dorn-nj-2017.