State v. Dorian

825 P.2d 296, 111 Or. App. 645, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 400
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 26, 1992·No. 89-12-36920; CA A66423·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions on two counts of burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, two counts of kidnapping in the second degree, ORS 163.225, and one count of assault in the fourth degree. ORS 163.160.

Defendant first contends that there was not sufficient evidence to support the convictions and that, therefore, his motion for judgment of acquittal should have been allowed. There was sufficient evidence. The court did not err.

The state concedes that the separate convictions for burglary merge and that the kidnapping convictions merge. We accept that concession.

Defendant also argues that he should have been given credit for the time that he served awaiting sentencing. The Department of Corrections, not the sentencing court, has the authority to allow that credit. ORS 137.320; Gage v. Maass, 306 Or 196, 759 P2d 1049 (1988).

Conviction for assault in the fourth degree affirmed; remanded for entry of single judgment of conviction for burglary in the first degree and single judgment of conviction for kidnapping in the second degree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dorian, 825 P.2d 296, 111 Or. App. 645, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 400 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

825 P.2d 296 (State v. Dorian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gage v. Maass
759 P.2d 1049 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1988)