State v. Dora

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Dora

527 S.W.3d 890

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 12, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104741

StatusPublished

This text of 527 S.W.3d 890 (State v. Dora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dora, 527 S.W.3d 890 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tommy Dora appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. The evidence was sufficient to support the convictions, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tommy Dora appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. The evidence was sufficient to support the convictions, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

527 S.W.3d 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dora-moctapp-2017.