State v. Donovan

95 A. 1041, 29 Del. 42, 6 Boyce 42, 1915 Del. LEXIS 66
New York Court of General Session of the Peace·Decided June 30, 1915·No. No. 5·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Boyce, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

The accused is charged with wickedly, unlawfully, maliciously and willfully soliciting one Washington Collins feloniously, willfully and unlawfully to set on fire a certain warehouse alleged to be the property of “the Smith Manufacturing Company.”

There is some conflict in the cases when a corporate name is pleaded, whether the fact of incorporation must be averred. Generally when the name in which the property is laid imports an incorporation such fact will be presumed. Where the name of a corporation is stated as owner, there need be no averment that it is a corporation. State v. Rollo, 3 Penn. 421, 54 Atl. 683; 22 Cyc. 352; 10 Ency. Plead. & Prac. 509.

The gravamen of the offense charged is the solicitation of another to set on fire a warehouse. The solicitation constitutes the crime. We decline the motion for binding instructions.

No testimony was introduced on behalf of the accused.

Boyce, , J., charged'the jury.-

Verdict, guilty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Donovan, 95 A. 1041, 29 Del. 42, 6 Boyce 42, 1915 Del. LEXIS 66 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1915).

95 A. 1041 (State v. Donovan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. State
346 A.2d 158 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1975)
United Railways & Electric Co. v. State Ex Rel. Lapka
163 A. 90 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1932)