State v. Donovan

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Donovan

567 S.W.3d 695

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106382

StatusPublished

This text of 567 S.W.3d 695 (State v. Donovan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Donovan, 567 S.W.3d 695 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*696James Donovan appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for endangering a correctional employee and damaging jail property. There was no clear, evident or obvious error, nor grounds to believe a manifest injustice occurred, and plain error review is not warranted. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*696James Donovan appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for endangering a correctional employee and damaging jail property. There was no clear, evident or obvious error, nor grounds to believe a manifest injustice occurred, and plain error review is not warranted. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 S.W.3d 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-donovan-moctapp-2019.