State v. Donovan

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Donovan

567 S.W.3d 695

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Donovan. Read the opinion of the Court — 539 S.W.3d 57 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2019·No. No. ED 106382·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*696James Donovan appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for endangering a correctional employee and damaging jail property. There was no clear, evident or obvious error, nor grounds to believe a manifest injustice occurred, and plain error review is not warranted. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*696James Donovan appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for endangering a correctional employee and damaging jail property. There was no clear, evident or obvious error, nor grounds to believe a manifest injustice occurred, and plain error review is not warranted. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Donovan, 567 S.W.3d 695 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

567 S.W.3d 695 (State v. Donovan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.