State v. Donaldson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Donaldson

227 S.W.3d 531, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 963, 2007 WL 1814390

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 26, 2007

DocketED 88215

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 227 S.W.3d 531 (State v. Donaldson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Donaldson, 227 S.W.3d 531, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 963, 2007 WL 1814390 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles R. Donaldson (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury found him guilty of four counts of first degree robbery, Section 569.020 RSMo (2000) 1 ! four counts of second degree assault, Section 565.060, and four counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Defendant was sentenced to four concurrent terms of twenty-five years’ imprisonment for the robberies, four concurrent terms of seven years’ imprisonment for the assaults, and four concurrent terms of twenty years’ imprisonment for the armed criminal action counts. Each of those terms of imprisonment are to run consecutively, totaling fifty-two years’ imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections.

Defendant raises one point on appeal. Defendant claims the trial court erred in denying his request for a mistrial because he believes there was testimony admitted which involved uncharged misconduct. Defendant alleges the jury convicted him because, of this testimony and not due to the evidence produced regarding the robberies.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All further statutory references herein are to RSMo (2000) unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles R. Donaldson (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury found him guilty of four counts of first degree robbery, Section 569.020 RSMo (2000) 1 ! four counts of second degree assault, Section 565.060, and four counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Defendant was sentenced to four concurrent terms of twenty-five years’ imprisonment for the robberies, four concurrent terms of seven years’ imprisonment for the assaults, and four concurrent terms of twenty years’ imprisonment for the armed criminal action counts. Each of those terms of imprisonment are to run consecutively, totaling fifty-two years’ imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections.

Defendant raises one point on appeal. Defendant claims the trial court erred in denying his request for a mistrial because he believes there was testimony admitted which involved uncharged misconduct. Defendant alleges the jury convicted him because, of this testimony and not due to the evidence produced regarding the robberies.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All further statutory references herein are to RSMo (2000) unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 S.W.3d 531, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 963, 2007 WL 1814390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-donaldson-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack