State v. Domut

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Domut. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 Haw. 183
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided December 11, 2018·No. SCWC-16-0000402·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 11-DEC-2018 02:21 PM

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

VICENTE L. DOMUT, also known as VICENTE DOMUT, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NOS. 2DTA-15-01298 and 2DTC-14-004621)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Vicente L. Domut, also known as Vicente Domut’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 29, 2018, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 11, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Domut, (haw 2018).

State v. Domut (State v. Domut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.