State v. Domut

Hawaii Supreme Court

State v. Domut

DecidedDecember 11, 2018

DocketSCWC-16-0000402

StatusPublished

This text of State v. Domut (State v. Domut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Domut, (haw 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 11-DEC-2018 02:21 PM SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

VICENTE L. DOMUT, also known as VICENTE DOMUT, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NOS. 2DTA-15-01298 and 2DTC-14-004621)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Vicente L. Domut, also known as Vicente Domut’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 29, 2018, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 11, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 11-DEC-2018 02:21 PM SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

VICENTE L. DOMUT, also known as VICENTE DOMUT, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NOS. 2DTA-15-01298 and 2DTC-14-004621)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Vicente L. Domut, also known as Vicente Domut’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 29, 2018, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 11, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Domut, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-domut-haw-2018.