State v. Dominguez

328 Or. App. 653
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 11, 2023
DocketA177486
StatusUnpublished

This text of 328 Or. App. 653 (State v. Dominguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Dominguez, 328 Or. App. 653 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1). Argued and submitted August 30, affirmed October 11, 2023

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ISAIAH MATTHEW DOMINGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Klamath County Circuit Court 20CR68098, 21CR10049; A177486 (Control), A177487

Marci Warner Adkisson, Judge. Erik Blumenthal, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. Also on the briefs was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellant Section, Office of Public Defense Services. Lauren P. Robertson, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General. Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Davis-McCoy, 300 Or App 326, 454 P3d 48 (2019); State v. Silsby, 282 Or App 104, 108-09, 386 P3d 172 (2016), rev den, 360 Or 752 (2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Silsby
386 P.3d 172 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2016)
State v. Davis-McCoy
454 P.3d 48 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 Or. App. 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dominguez-orctapp-2023.