State v. D.M.
This text of 129 A.3d 326 (State v. D.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the issues of whether the trial court improperly permitted the prosecutor to question defendant about evidence that had previously been ruled inadmissible under N.J.R.E. 404(b); whether the trial court’s limiting instructions on this evidence were improper; and whether the prosecutor’s statements during summation about this evidence constituted misconduct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 A.3d 326, 224 N.J. 119, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dm-nj-2016.