State v. D.M.

129 A.3d 326, 224 N.J. 119, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 34
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 15, 2016
StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.3d 326 (State v. D.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. D.M., 129 A.3d 326, 224 N.J. 119, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 34 (N.J. 2016).

Opinion

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the issues of whether the trial court improperly permitted the prosecutor to question defendant about evidence that had previously been ruled inadmissible under N.J.R.E. 404(b); whether the trial court’s limiting instructions on this evidence were improper; and whether the prosecutor’s statements during summation about this evidence constituted misconduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 A.3d 326, 224 N.J. 119, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dm-nj-2016.