State v. D.M.

129 A.3d 326, 224 N.J. 119, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 34
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 15, 2016·Published

Opinion

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the issues of whether the trial court improperly permitted the prosecutor to question defendant about evidence that had previously been ruled inadmissible under N.J.R.E. 404(b); whether the trial court’s limiting instructions on this evidence were improper; and whether the prosecutor’s statements during summation about this evidence constituted misconduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. D.M., 129 A.3d 326, 224 N.J. 119, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 34 (N.J. 2016).

129 A.3d 326 (State v. D.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.