State v. Dluhos
This text of 2024 Ohio 4752 (State v. Dluhos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Dluhos, 2024-Ohio-4752.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY
STATE OF OHIO, CASE NOS. 2024-P-0054 2024-P-0055 Plaintiff-Appellee, 2024-P-0056
- vs - Criminal Appeals from the FAITH B. DLUHOS a.k.a. Court of Common Pleas FAITH B. DLUHUS,
Defendant-Appellant. Trial Court Nos. 2022 CR 01040 2022 CR 01428 2022 CR 00070
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Decided: September 30, 2024 Judgment: Appeals dismissed
Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
Eric R. Fink, 11 River Street, Kent, OH 44240 (For Defendant-Appellant).
JOHN J. EKLUND, J.
{¶1} On August 22, 2024, appellant, Faith B. Dluhos a.k.a. Faith B. Dluhus,
through counsel, filed notices of appeal from the trial court’s July 22, 2024 entry granting
appellee, the State of Ohio’s, motion to revoke and modify sanctions. Timely notices were
due no later than August 21, 2024, which was not a holiday or weekend. The appeals
are untimely by one day. {¶2} “[A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry
shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.” App.R.
4(A)(1).
{¶3} App.R. 5(A)(1) states:
{¶4} “After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for the
filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with leave
of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:
{¶5} “(a) Criminal proceedings . . .”
{¶6} App.R. 5(A)(2) further provides that “[a] motion for leave to appeal shall be
filed with the court of appeals and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant
to perfect an appeal as of right.”
{¶7} Appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R.
4(A)(1) nor sought leave to appeal under App.R. 5(A). Thus, this court is without
jurisdiction to consider her appeals. Appellant has a remedy of filing an untimely criminal
appeal under App.R. 5(A).
{¶8} Accordingly, these appeals are hereby dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely.
EUGENE A. LUCCI, P.J.,
ROBERT J. PATTON, J.,
concur.
Case No. 2024-P-0054, 2024-P-0055, 2024-P-0056
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 Ohio 4752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dluhos-ohioctapp-2024.