State v. DIZER

361 S.W.3d 8, 2008 WL 5505853, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1653
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 2, 2008·No. ED 90507·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Dizer (Defendant) appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of one count of resisting a lawful stop in violation of Section 575.150, RSMo 2000. The trial court sentenced Defendant to one year of imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. DIZER, 361 S.W.3d 8, 2008 WL 5505853, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1653 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

361 S.W.3d 8 (State v. DIZER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spiegel v. Spiegel
361 S.W.3d 8 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)