State v. Dixon
571 P.2d 922, 31 Or. App. 1027, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2864
This text of 571 P.2d 922 (State v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Dixon, 571 P.2d 922, 31 Or. App. 1027, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2864 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).
Opinion
Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that his defense was prejudiced by the state’s failure to comply with the discovery statute, ORS 135.815, and that therefore his conviction for prostitution should be reversed. Not only did defendant not make a record of any specific prejudice, he did not request discovery in accordance with the discovery statute, ORS 135.845.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
571 P.2d 922, 31 Or. App. 1027, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dixon-orctapp-1977.