State v. Dixon

1999 Ohio 57, 87 Ohio St. 3d 256
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Dixon. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 Ohio St. 3d 1428
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 30, 1999·No. 1999-1333·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 256.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. DIXON, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Dixon, 1999-Ohio-57.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Conyers. (No. 99-1333—Submitted November 3, 1999—Decided December 1, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-97-1318. __________________ Julia R. Bates, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and Eric A. Baum, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Conyers (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 246, 719 N.E.2d 535. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dixon, 1999 Ohio 57, 87 Ohio St. 3d 256 (Ohio 1999).

1999 Ohio 57 (State v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Conyers
87 Ohio St. 3d 246 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
State v. Dixon
719 N.E.2d 543 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)