State v. Dixon
Opinion
In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 105-3310; to [649]*649the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KH-573.
Granted. Because relator’s application for writs on direct review was not filed within the statutory delay period, see La. C.Cr.P. art. 922(B); La.S.Ct.R.X Section 5, his conviction and sentence became final on March 25, 2008. Relator’s application for post-conviction relief, filed on March 29, 2010, is therefore time-barred by La. C.Cr .P. art. 930.8. See State ex rel. Hall v. State, 99-0326 (La.9/24/99), 871 So.2d 1071. Accordingly, the Fifth Circuit’s ruling remanding the case for consideration is reversed and the district court’s ruling dismissing the application as untimely filed is reinstated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
61 So. 3d 648 (State v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.