State v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Dixon

556 So. 2d 29, 1990 La. LEXIS 31, 1990 WL 685

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 5, 1990

DocketNo. 89-KH-3011

StatusPublished

This text of 556 So. 2d 29 (State v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dixon, 556 So. 2d 29, 1990 La. LEXIS 31, 1990 WL 685 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Dixon, Patrick; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “F", No. 161-163.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he claims to have filed on or about October 16, 1989. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Dixon, Patrick; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “F", No. 161-163.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he claims to have filed on or about October 16, 1989. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 So. 2d 29, 1990 La. LEXIS 31, 1990 WL 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dixon-la-1990.