State v. Dixon
This text of 97 Ind. 125 (State v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The State appeals in this case from the decision of the court below in sustaining appellee’s motion to quash the indictment. An instrument without any title, but purporting to be an indictment, is copied into the transcript, but how or by what means it obtained a place among the records of the court below, does not appear. It is not shown to have been returned into open court by the grand jury. As the record comes to us, we are not able to say that there was error in quashing the indictment. Sections 1670 and 1672, R. S. 1881; Adams v. State, 11 Ind. 304; Springer v. State, 19 Ind. 180; Heacock v. State, 42 Ind. 393; Mitchell v. State, 63 Ind. 276. The law is settled in the cases cited that an indictment should be quashed, or a motion in arrest of judgment sustained, if the indictment was not returned into open court by the grand jury, and that, upon appeal to this court., the record must show affirmatively that it was so returned. It may be that the court below sustained the motion to quash for the reason that the indictment was never, in fact, presented by the grand jury. Be that as it may, it devolves upon a party bringing a.case to this court to show from the record [126]*126that there was error in the decision complained of. In the absence of such showing, this court will indulge all reasonable presumptions in favor of the correctness of the decision.
Affirmed.
Filed Sept. 20, 1884.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 Ind. 125, 1884 Ind. LEXIS 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dixon-ind-1884.