State v. Dist. Ct. Volosin (Jefferey)
This text of State v. Dist. Ct. Volosin (Jefferey) (State v. Dist. Ct. Volosin (Jefferey)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
the information, see NRS 177.015(1)(b); State v. Koseck, 112 Nev. 244, 245, 911 P.2d 1196, 1197 (1996) (observing that NRS 177.015(1)(b) "provides the state with a right to appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss"); see also State v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 85 Nev. 381, 383- 84, 455 P.2d 923, 925 (1969). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'
'ACLA J. Hardesty Saitta
cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Attorney General/Carson City Carson City District Attorney State Public Defender/Carson City Carson City Clerk
'The State has filed a motion to seal the appendix pursuant to NRS 200.3771 to protect the confidentiality of the victims, as they are identified in documents and transcripts included in the appendix. We deny the motion because it does not comport with our decision in Howard v. State, 128 Nev. , , 291 P.3d 137, 143 (2012) (explaining the requirements for sealing records and documents in criminal cases pending before this court). We further deny the State's motion to treat the original writ petition as an emergency.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
CESEN
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Dist. Ct. Volosin (Jefferey), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dist-ct-volosin-jefferey-nev-2013.