State v. Dingle

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Dingle

DecidedDecember 23, 2014

Docket2014-UP-475

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Dingle (State v. Dingle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dingle, (S.C. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Samuel Dingle, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-193567

Appeal from Orangeburg County Edgar W. Dickson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-475 Submitted October 1, 2014 – Filed December 23, 2014

AFFIRMED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, and Appellant Defenders Breen Richard Stevens and Benjamin John Tripp, all of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor David Michael Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Donahue, 400 S.C. 604, 607 n.1, 735 S.E.2d 547, 549 n.1 (Ct. App. 2012) (noting an argument that is not presented to the trial judge is not preserved for appellate review); State v. Stroman, 281 S.C. 508, 513, 316 S.E.2d 395, 399 (1984) ("[A] party cannot complain of an error which his own conduct has induced." (internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Samuel Dingle, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-193567

Appeal from Orangeburg County Edgar W. Dickson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-475 Submitted October 1, 2014 – Filed December 23, 2014

AFFIRMED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, and Appellant Defenders Breen Richard Stevens and Benjamin John Tripp, all of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor David Michael Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Donahue, 400 S.C. 604, 607 n.1, 735 S.E.2d 547, 549 n.1 (Ct. App. 2012) (noting an argument that is not presented to the trial judge is not preserved for appellate review); State v. Stroman, 281 S.C. 508, 513, 316 S.E.2d 395, 399 (1984) ("[A] party cannot complain of an error which his own conduct has induced." (internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Dingle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dingle-scctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack