State v. Din

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Din

789 P.2d 19, 101 Or. App. 233, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 321

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 4, 1990

DocketC88-1112CR; CA A60061

StatusPublished

This text of 789 P.2d 19 (State v. Din) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Din, 789 P.2d 19, 101 Or. App. 233, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 321 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for theft in the first degree. The court imposed a $50 victim’s assistance fee as part of the sentence. Because the conviction was treated as a misdemeanor for sentencing, pursuant to ORS 161.705, only a $20 victim’s assistance fee is authorized. ORS 147.259(1). The state concedes, and we agree, that the court erred in imposing the $50 assessment.

Defendant’s other assignments do not warrant discussion.

Sentence to pay victim’s assistance fee vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for theft in the first degree. The court imposed a $50 victim’s assistance fee as part of the sentence. Because the conviction was treated as a misdemeanor for sentencing, pursuant to ORS 161.705, only a $20 victim’s assistance fee is authorized. ORS 147.259(1). The state concedes, and we agree, that the court erred in imposing the $50 assessment.

Defendant’s other assignments do not warrant discussion.

Sentence to pay victim’s assistance fee vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

789 P.2d 19, 101 Or. App. 233, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-din-orctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack