State v. Dillahunt
This text of 94 S.E.2d 479 (State v. Dillahunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a criminal action neither the husband nor the wife is competent to testify against the other. G.S. 8-57. The rule is subject to certain exceptions not material here. The prohibition extends to declarations made by one spouse not in the presence of the other. It is the duty of the presiding judge to exclude such evidence. Objection is not necessary. S. v. Warren, 236 N.C. 358, 72 S.E. 2d 763. The Attorney General concedes the State’s inability to distinguish between this and the Warren case and on its authority the assignment of error is sustained and a new trial ordered.
New trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 S.E.2d 479, 244 N.C. 524, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dillahunt-nc-1956.