State v. Dickerson

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Dickerson

2022 Ohio 4732, 220 N.E.3d 791, 171 Ohio St. 3d 794

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 30, 2022

Docket2022-0296

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2022 Ohio 4732 (State v. Dickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dickerson, 2022 Ohio 4732, 220 N.E.3d 791, 171 Ohio St. 3d 794 (Ohio 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Dickerson, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4732.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-4732 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. DICKERSON, APPELLEE. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Dickerson, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4732.] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Bourn and cause remanded for further proceedings. (No. 2022-0296―Submitted November 29, 2022―Decided December 30, 2022.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 109434, 2022-Ohio-298. _________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Bourn, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-4321, __ N.E.3d __, and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, and DEWINE, JJ., concur. DONNELLY and STEWART, JJ., would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently allowed. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

BRUNNER, J., dissents for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion in Bourn. _________________ Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Russell S. Bensing, for appellee, Oscar Dickerson. _________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Dickerson, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4732.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-4732 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. DICKERSON, APPELLEE. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Dickerson, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4732.] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Bourn and cause remanded for further proceedings. (No. 2022-0296―Submitted November 29, 2022―Decided December 30, 2022.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 109434, 2022-Ohio-298. _________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Bourn, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-4321, __ N.E.3d __, and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, and DEWINE, JJ., concur. DONNELLY and STEWART, JJ., would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently allowed. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

BRUNNER, J., dissents for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion in Bourn. _________________ Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Russell S. Bensing, for appellee, Oscar Dickerson. _________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2022 Ohio 4732, 220 N.E.3d 791, 171 Ohio St. 3d 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dickerson-ohio-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack