State v. Dickerson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Dickerson

934 S.W.2d 29, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1893, 1996 WL 666199

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 19, 1996·No. No. 69375·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Ken Dickerson, appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of tampering in the first degree, § 569.080 RSMo 1986. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior and persistent offender under § 558.016 RSMo Cum.Supp. 1993, to ten years imprisonment to be served concurrently with a sentence imposed on a prior conviction. We affirm.

The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Ken Dickerson, appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of tampering in the first degree, § 569.080 RSMo 1986. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior and persistent offender under § 558.016 RSMo Cum.Supp. 1993, to ten years imprisonment to be served concurrently with a sentence imposed on a prior conviction. We affirm.

The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Dickerson, 934 S.W.2d 29, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1893, 1996 WL 666199 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

934 S.W.2d 29 (State v. Dickerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.