State v. DiBenedetto
85 A. 1135, 83 N.J.L. 792, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 237
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trench ard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogbrt, Yredenburgit, Congdon, White, Tkeacy, JJ. 12.
For reversal- — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. DiBenedetto, 85 A. 1135, 83 N.J.L. 792, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 237 (N.J. 1912).
85 A. 1135 (State v. DiBenedetto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burke v. State
35 Ohio C.C. Dec. 713 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1920)