State v. Diaz

590 S.E.2d 396, 357 N.C. 659
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 4, 2003·No. 581P03·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

590 S.E.2d 396 (2003)
357 N.C. 659

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Ruben Aburto DIAZ and Jose Juan Espinoza Lopez.

No. 581P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 4, 2003.

Jose Juan Espinoza Lopez, Pro Se.

Newton G. Pritchett, Jr., David J. Adinoilfi, II, Assistant Attorney Generals, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: 155 N.C.App. 307, 575 S.E.2d 523.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (Lopez) in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of December 2003."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Diaz, 590 S.E.2d 396, 357 N.C. 659 (N.C. 2003).

590 S.E.2d 396 (State v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mobley
696 S.E.2d 862 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
State v. MacKey
664 S.E.2d 78 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
State v. Arroyo
663 S.E.2d 14 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)