State v. Diaz
This text of 855 So. 2d 732 (State v. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Denied. Although the district court erred by granting the state’s motion to reconsider its ruling granting relator’s application for post-conviction relief, see La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.6; State v. Ford, 96-2919 (La.5/30/97), 694 So.2d 917; State v. Clayton, 96-1658 (La.2/27/97), 687 So.2d 996; State ex rel. Lewis v. Cr.D.C., 571 So.2d 659 (La.1990), relator’s underlying claim concerning the district court’s failure to determine his competence to proceed after the state and the defense filed a joint motion for a mental status examination is time-barred by La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 and State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
855 So. 2d 732, 2003 La. LEXIS 2243, 2003 WL 22061285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-diaz-la-2003.