Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Diaz

State v. Diaz

440 So. 2d 1318, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23588
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 1983
DocketNo. 83-264
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 440 So. 2d 1318 (State v. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Diaz, 440 So. 2d 1318, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23588 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An executive warrant which is regular on its face and complies with the essential requirements for extradition, presents a prima facie showing of the propriety of extradition. See Moore v. State, 407 So.2d 991 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We reject Diaz’ contention that the necessary documents were facially improper because they contained no express language finding probable cause. The warrant signed by the superior court judge, however, sufficiently established probable cause for extradition. State v. Norman, 362 So.2d 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

France v. Judd
932 So. 2d 1263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
State v. Scoratow
456 So. 2d 922 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
440 So. 2d 1318, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-diaz-fladistctapp-1983.