State v. Diaz

688 P.2d 1011, 142 Ariz. 119, 1984 Ariz. LEXIS 285
CourtArizona Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 3, 1984
Docket6303-PR
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 688 P.2d 1011 (State v. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Diaz, 688 P.2d 1011, 142 Ariz. 119, 1984 Ariz. LEXIS 285 (Ark. 1984).

Opinion

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.

The defendant Louis Martinez Diaz was tried and convicted of two counts charging burglary in the second degree with a prior conviction. The trial court sentenced him to prison for 7.5 years on each count with the sentences to be served concurrently. The sentence on each count was enhanced by reason of the conviction on the other count.

On appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions but reduced the sentence on one of the counts to 5 years. State v. Louis Martinez Diaz, 142 Ariz. 136, 688 P.2d 1028 (App.1984). The defendant and the state filed for review. We denied the defendant’s petition for review and granted that of the state. The issue presented for review by the state was:

*120 “When a defendant is charged with two offenses occurring on separate occasions but consolidated for trial, and each offense is alleged to be a prior of the other pursuant to Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 13-604(H), and the defendant is convicted of both offenses, must the trial court treat each conviction as a subsequent one for sentencing purposes?”

The Court of Appeals answered the above question by holding that only one of the two convictions could be considered a prior. We agree with the decision and reasoning of the Court of Appeals; therefore, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is approved and adopted by this court. Any suggestion to the contrary in State v. Ry-bolt, 133 Ariz. 276, 650 P.2d 1258 (App.1982), is overruled.

The judgments of conviction are affirmed, and the sentences as modified by the Court of Appeals are affirmed.

GORDON, Y.C.J., and HAYS, CAMERON and FELDMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Arizona v. Michael Lorenzo Rivera
Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2011
State v. Rivera
247 P.3d 560 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2011)
State v. Fimbres
213 P.3d 1020 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2009)
State of Arizona v. Javier Fimbres
Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2009
State v. Condon
2007 SD 124 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2007)
State v. Miranda
10 P.3d 1213 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2000)
Zamora v. Superior Court
904 P.2d 1294 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1995)
State v. Olea
897 P.2d 1371 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1995)
State v. West
862 P.2d 192 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1993)
State v. Smith
828 P.2d 778 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1992)
State v. White
770 P.2d 328 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1989)
Pointe Resorts, Inc. v. Culbertson
761 P.2d 1041 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Driggs
745 P.2d 135 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Driggs
745 P.2d 132 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1986)
State v. O'Haire
720 P.2d 119 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1986)
State v. Schneider
715 P.2d 297 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
State v. Fierson
705 P.2d 1338 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
State v. Superior Court in and for Maricopa
689 P.2d 539 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
688 P.2d 1011, 142 Ariz. 119, 1984 Ariz. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-diaz-ariz-1984.