State v. Diar

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Diar

850 N.E.2d 64, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1401

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 29, 2006

Docket2005-2264

StatusPublished

This text of 850 N.E.2d 64 (State v. Diar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Diar, 850 N.E.2d 64, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1401 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Lorain C.P. No. 04CR065248. This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Lorain County. Upon consideration of the motions to withdraw as counsel of Michael C. Alberty and Carl J. Rose,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions are granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that the Ohio Public Defender is appointed to represent the appellant in this appeal, and that the time for filing appellant’s merit brief shall be calculated from the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lorain C.P. No. 04CR065248. This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Lorain County. Upon consideration of the motions to withdraw as counsel of Michael C. Alberty and Carl J. Rose,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions are granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that the Ohio Public Defender is appointed to represent the appellant in this appeal, and that the time for filing appellant’s merit brief shall be calculated from the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

850 N.E.2d 64, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-diar-ohio-2006.