State v. Diamondstone
365 A.2d 536, 134 Vt. 608, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 752
This text of 365 A.2d 536 (State v. Diamondstone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Diamondstone, 365 A.2d 536, 134 Vt. 608, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 752 (Vt. 1976).
Opinion
It being acknowledged by the State that expert testimony was improperly received, to the prejudice of the defendant, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Debanville
457 A.2d 650 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
365 A.2d 536, 134 Vt. 608, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-diamondstone-vt-1976.