State v. Diamondstone
365 A.2d 536, 134 Vt. 608, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 752
Opinion
It being acknowledged by the State that expert testimony was improperly received, to the prejudice of the defendant, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Diamondstone, 365 A.2d 536, 134 Vt. 608, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 752 (Vt. 1976).
365 A.2d 536 (State v. Diamondstone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Debanville
457 A.2d 650 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1983)