State v. Di Maria
100 A. 1071, 90 N.J.L. 341, 5 Gummere 341, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 340
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
[342]*342For affirmance—The Chancellor., Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, GARDNER, JJ. 11.
For reversal—US one.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Di Maria, 100 A. 1071, 90 N.J.L. 341, 5 Gummere 341, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 340 (N.J. 1917).
100 A. 1071 (State v. Di Maria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Provoid
266 A.2d 307 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
State v. Abbott
165 A.2d 537 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
McAndrew v. Mularchuk
162 A.2d 820 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)
State v. Centalonza
86 A.2d 780 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
State v. Goldberg
79 A.2d 702 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)