State v. Di Maria

100 A. 1071, 90 N.J.L. 341, 5 Gummere 341, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 340
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 5, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 100 A. 1071 (State v. Di Maria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Di Maria, 100 A. 1071, 90 N.J.L. 341, 5 Gummere 341, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 340 (N.J. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

[342]*342For affirmance—The Chancellor., Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, GARDNER, JJ. 11.

For reversal—US one.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Provoid
266 A.2d 307 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
State v. Abbott
165 A.2d 537 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
McAndrew v. Mularchuk
162 A.2d 820 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)
State v. Centalonza
86 A.2d 780 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
State v. Goldberg
79 A.2d 702 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A. 1071, 90 N.J.L. 341, 5 Gummere 341, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-di-maria-nj-1917.