State v. D.H.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. D.H.

123 So. 3d 1175, 2013 WL 949879, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3962

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 13, 2013

DocketNo. 4D12-1520

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 So. 3d 1175 (State v. D.H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. D.H., 123 So. 3d 1175, 2013 WL 949879, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3962 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An order granting a defendant’s pretrial motion in limine is not appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, but the order is reviewable by common-law certiorari. See State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988); State v. Sealy Doe, 861 So.2d 530 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). We therefore treat the state’s appeal of the order granting the motion in limine as a petition for writ of certiorari. The petition is denied.

Denied.

WARNER, STEVENSON and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

An order granting a defendant’s pretrial motion in limine is not appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, but the order is reviewable by common-law certiorari. See State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988); State v. Sealy Doe, 861 So.2d 530 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). We therefore treat the state’s appeal of the order granting the motion in limine as a petition for writ of certiorari. The petition is denied.

Denied.

WARNER, STEVENSON and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 So. 3d 1175, 2013 WL 949879, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dh-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack