State v. Dezort

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Dezort

95 P.3d 754, 194 Or. App. 598, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 992

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 11, 2004

Docket0305-64688; A121658

StatusPublished

This text of 95 P.3d 754 (State v. Dezort) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dezort, 95 P.3d 754, 194 Or. App. 598, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 992 (Or. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this civil commitment proceeding, appellant assigns error to the trial court’s determination that the state proved by clear and convincing evidence that appellant was a danger to himself. See ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient and, based on our review of the record and State v. Webb, 186 Or App 404, 63 P3d 1258 (2003), we accept that concession.

Because we reverse on that ground, we need not address appellant’s assignment of error concerning whether he was entitled to be physically present at the commitment hearing.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this civil commitment proceeding, appellant assigns error to the trial court’s determination that the state proved by clear and convincing evidence that appellant was a danger to himself. See ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient and, based on our review of the record and State v. Webb, 186 Or App 404, 63 P3d 1258 (2003), we accept that concession.

Because we reverse on that ground, we need not address appellant’s assignment of error concerning whether he was entitled to be physically present at the commitment hearing.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 P.3d 754, 194 Or. App. 598, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dezort-orctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack