State v. Dewalt

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Dewalt

504 S.W.3d 101, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 798, 2016 WL 4437984

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 23, 2016·No. No. ED 102850·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Roderick DeWalt appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree assault, armed criminal action, and leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the State presented sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s judgment. State v. Rousan, 961 S.W.2d 831, 841 (Mo. banc 1998). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Roderick DeWalt appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree assault, armed criminal action, and leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the State presented sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s judgment. State v. Rousan, 961 S.W.2d 831, 841 (Mo. banc 1998). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Dewalt, 504 S.W.3d 101, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 798, 2016 WL 4437984 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

504 S.W.3d 101 (State v. Dewalt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related