State v. Devoil

865 S.W.2d 896, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1880, 1993 WL 498745
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 7, 1993
DocketNos. 62554, 64017
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 865 S.W.2d 896 (State v. Devoil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Devoil, 865 S.W.2d 896, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1880, 1993 WL 498745 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions, by a jury, of stealing from a person, § 570.030, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a prior, persistent and class X offender to a sixteen year prison term. Defendant also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. A written opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tyrone Devoil-El v. Michael Groose, Superintendent
160 F.3d 1184 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
865 S.W.2d 896, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1880, 1993 WL 498745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-devoil-moctapp-1993.