State v. Devine

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Devine

547 So. 2d 1304, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2069, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4899, 1989 WL 101302

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 5, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2028

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 547 So. 2d 1304 (State v. Devine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Devine, 547 So. 2d 1304, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2069, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4899, 1989 WL 101302 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellee confesses error in the failure of the trial court to support the downward departure sentence by written reasons. See State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. McDavid, 532 So.2d 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Accordingly, the case is remanded with directions to supply those reasons, to permit the defendant to withdraw his nolo plea and go to trial, or to sentence him within the guidelines.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellee confesses error in the failure of the trial court to support the downward departure sentence by written reasons. See State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. McDavid, 532 So.2d 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Accordingly, the case is remanded with directions to supply those reasons, to permit the defendant to withdraw his nolo plea and go to trial, or to sentence him within the guidelines.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 So. 2d 1304, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2069, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4899, 1989 WL 101302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-devine-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack