State v. Devine
547 So. 2d 1304, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2069, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4899, 1989 WL 101302
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 1989·No. No. 88-2028·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The appellee confesses error in the failure of the trial court to support the downward departure sentence by written reasons. See State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. McDavid, 532 So.2d 1125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Accordingly, the case is remanded with directions to supply those reasons, to permit the defendant to withdraw his nolo plea and go to trial, or to sentence him within the guidelines.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Devine, 547 So. 2d 1304, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2069, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4899, 1989 WL 101302 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
547 So. 2d 1304 (State v. Devine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Arnold
550 So. 2d 154 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)