State v. Deters

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Deters

525 S.W.3d 217, 2017 WL 3597029, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 812

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 22, 2017·No. No. ED 104173·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Deters appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction after a jury trial for driving while intoxicated. There was no error in the admission of evidence regarding his refusal to take field sobriety tests and a pre-arrest breath test and no plain error arising from the, prosecutor’s comments during closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for. their information- only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Deters appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction after a jury trial for driving while intoxicated. There was no error in the admission of evidence regarding his refusal to take field sobriety tests and a pre-arrest breath test and no plain error arising from the, prosecutor’s comments during closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for. their information- only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Deters, 525 S.W.3d 217, 2017 WL 3597029, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 812 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

525 S.W.3d 217 (State v. Deters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.