State v. DesLaurier

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. DesLaurier

632 A.2d 705, 227 Conn. 930, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 364, 1993 WL 438112

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedOctober 5, 1993

DocketSC 14845

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 632 A.2d 705 (State v. DesLaurier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. DesLaurier, 632 A.2d 705, 227 Conn. 930, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 364, 1993 WL 438112 (Colo. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 553 (AC 10352), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the statement made by the defendant to police officers Tony Dostank and John Módica was admissible into evidence?

“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in deciding that the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion for a competency exam under General Statutes § 54-56d?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 553 (AC 10352), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the statement made by the defendant to police officers Tony Dostank and John Módica was admissible into evidence?

“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in deciding that the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion for a competency exam under General Statutes § 54-56d?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

632 A.2d 705, 227 Conn. 930, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 364, 1993 WL 438112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-deslaurier-conn-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack