State v. D.E.R.
887 So. 2d 441, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18153, 2004 WL 2726004
Opinion
Based upon our conclusion that the record evidence fully supports the trial court’s finding that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to conduct a pat down search of the appellee/juvenile, we affirm the order granting the motion to suppress. See Ray v. State, 849 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Coleman v. State, 723 So.2d 387 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); E.H. v. State, 593 So.2d 243 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. D.E.R., 887 So. 2d 441, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18153, 2004 WL 2726004 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
887 So. 2d 441 (State v. D.E.R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ray v. State
849 So. 2d 1222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Coleman v. State
723 So. 2d 387 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
E.H. v. State
593 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)