Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. D.E.R.

State v. D.E.R.

887 So. 2d 441, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18153, 2004 WL 2726004
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 1, 2004
DocketNo. 3D04-922
StatusPublished

This text of 887 So. 2d 441 (State v. D.E.R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. D.E.R., 887 So. 2d 441, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18153, 2004 WL 2726004 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our conclusion that the record evidence fully supports the trial court’s finding that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to conduct a pat down search of the appellee/juvenile, we affirm the order granting the motion to suppress. See Ray v. State, 849 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Coleman v. State, 723 So.2d 387 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); E.H. v. State, 593 So.2d 243 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ray v. State
849 So. 2d 1222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Coleman v. State
723 So. 2d 387 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
E.H. v. State
593 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
887 So. 2d 441, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18153, 2004 WL 2726004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-der-fladistctapp-2004.